(1,2) Beginning in the 1970s, polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) were added to consumer products, including furniture, children’s products, and electronics. Their use is driven by flammability standards, usually based on small-scale fire testing, which may not accurately predict real life fire behavior. Given the large number of OPFRs in use, manufacturers can move toward healthier and safer products by developing innovative ways to reduce the risk of fire for electronics enclosures, upholstered furniture, building materials, and other consumer products without adding flame retardant chemicals.įlame retardants are added to consumer products and building materials to reduce the risk of fire. Obtaining the scientific evidence needed for regulation of OPFRs can take many years. Furthermore, data from toxicity testing, epidemiological studies, and risk assessments all suggest that there are health concerns at current exposure levels for both halogenated and nonhalogenated OPFRs. Exposure to OPFRs is ubiquitous in people and in outdoor and indoor environments, and OPFRs are now often found at higher levels compared to PBDE peak exposure levels. To address this question, we compared OPFRs with PBDEs for a wide range of properties. In this paper, we ask whether OPFRs are a better choice than PBDEs. This information was taken from a study where the carbon footprint was calculated based on a standardized portion of 40 g of protein, which is slightly less than the minimum daily requirement recommended by the United States Department of Agriculture for a healthy adult (46 g for women, 52 g for men) and corresponds to approximately 200 g of meat or fish.As the use of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), and the entire class of organohalogen flame retardants, is declining, the use of organophosphate ester flame retardants (OPFRs) is increasing. It is measured in kilograms ofĬarbon dioxide equivalent (kgCO2e) per normal serving (40 g) of edible protein in theĪccording to the most recent Global Salmon Initiative ( #GSI) Sustainability Report, farmed salmon has a carbon footprint of 0.60, lower than other commonly farmed species. #WeAreElanco #OneElanco #pethealth #developmentĭid you know that farmed salmon is one of the animal proteins with the lowest carbon footprint? The carbon footprint measures the total greenhouse gas emissions caused directly and indirectly by the elaboration of a product. I am filled with pride and can’t wait to see what’s next to come! It is an honor to learn from the best in the industry. I would like to thank my manager and mentor, Cheryl Bedford for being so generous and involved in my development, and also Brigitte Charbonneau for trusting and empowering me throughout the years. During the pandemic, my team & I had to work relentlessly in reinventing ourselves to better support our partners, and receiving this distinction in front of all my colleagues was an honor and a huge privilege. When I joined Elanco, I committed to the organization values’ and the Behavioral Pillar on a daily basis through the work we do. This pillar focuses on the essentials - to build mastery and to diligently deliver on our commitments to our partners and colleagues. I am thrilled to have received the Deliver Pillar Award during Elanco’s 2022 National Congress, given by our National Director of Pet Health Sales, Steve Myette
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |